insiderblmStreaming platform Twitch has backtracked on a new policy to change its spelling of “women” after criticism from transgender communities.
The company had said it would use the term “womxn” in order to be more gender neutral in its language.
But LGBT communities online called the change transphobic because it suggested trans women were not women.
“We’re committed to growing from these experiences… and ensuring we’re inclusive to all,” the company tweeted.
“Womxn” has become a popular alternative word for people who say that the term “women” has patriarchal roots. Some believe the term is inclusive of trans women and some non-binary people, but that is contested.
The spelling “stems from a longstanding objection to the word woman as it comes from man, and the linguistic roots of the word mean that it really does come from the word man,” Dr Clara Bradbury-Rance, fellow at King’s College London, told the BBC in 2018.
It echoes a trend in some Spanish-language communities that use the word “Latinx” to move away from the traditional use of genders in the language.
Twitch, a platform that is especially popular with gamers, announced its decision to swap “women” for “womxn” as part of its celebration of Women’s History Month.
“Join us in celebrating and supporting all the Womxn creating their own worlds, building their communities, and leading the way on Twitch,” the company said in a now-deleted tweet.
But the company faced a fierce backlash online as some suggested the company was making an explicit distinction between women and trans women.
On Tuesday Twitch apologised, saying writing “we want to assure you that we have, and will continue to, work with the LGBTQIA+ community. We’re still learning.”
“Our good intentions don’t always equate to positive impact, but we’re committed to growing from these experiences, doing better, and ensuring we’re inclusive to all,” the company said.
In 2018 the London museum Wellcome Collection faced backlash online after it used the term in an advert for an event about women’s writing. Critics, including numerous high-profile female journalists, said the term was “insulting and demeaning” to women.
