19.4 C
London
Monday, June 17, 2024

The UK Supreme Court hears a landmark patent case involving an AI “inventor”

Date:

Related stories

WHO hosts the first forum on traditional medicine

The World Health Organization will convene its first summit...

Despite profit-taking, the price of oil still records a weekly rise

As the dollar rose and oil speculators took profits...

Kenya bans churches after allegations of killing worshipers who were starved

According to a government document made public on Friday,...

In a landmark case concerning whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems can own patent rights, an American computer scientist on Thursday urged the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court to rule that he is entitled to patents over inventions created by his AI system.

In the UK, Stephen Thaler is requesting two patents for inventions that, in his words, were created by his “creativity machine,” known as DABUS.

His attempt to register the patents was rejected on the grounds that an invention cannot be made by a machine but rather by a person, a business, or both.

Thaler’s lawyer, Robert Jehan, told the Supreme Court in London that Thaler is “entitled to the rights of the DABUS inventions” because UK patent law doesn’t say that an invention “must have a human inventor to be patentable.”

Read Also  Twitter begins testing for the tweet edit button

The owner of an AI system is “entitled to inventions generated by the system and to the grant of patents for those inventions if patentable,” he claimed in court filings.

The UK Intellectual Property Office, which initially rejected Thaler’s applications in 2019, was represented by attorneys who argued the appeal should be rejected.

The British government recently held a public consultation on how AI-created inventions should be handled under the UK patent system, according to Stuart Baran, who claimed that the government decided not to change the law.

He added that while Thaler’s application to register DABUS as an inventor was approved in South Africa, his attempts to submit similar applications in the European Union, the United States, Australia, and Germany had all been rejected.

Read Also  Messages show the reasons why Musk and the Twitter CEO fell off

According to London-based patent attorney Mark Marfé, who is not involved in the case, Thaler’s Supreme Court appeal marks the first time the question of whether AI systems can own and transfer patent rights has been considered by a supreme-level court.

Before the hearing, Marfé said in a statement, “Patent laws will ultimately need to be amended for a machine to be named as an inventor of a patent.

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive awesome & exclusive content in your inbox, every week.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

insiderblm
insiderblmhttp://insiderblm.com
InsiderBLM is a fast-growing business site with deep financial, media, tech, and other industry verticals.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Latest stories